 |
| Photo: Greg Bartelmann |
And since I was already asked yesterday whether I was in my greetings this year from horoscopes quote: I have found no time to read some, but Dänekas wife has assured me that I have read all tangible yearly horoscopes. These are all the result, change it professionally for them nothing. Mrs. Dänekas, the Group Managing Director of the parliamentary party.
...
We are currently not a bed of roses, and when Guido Westerwelle today in Stuttgart does not hold a brilliant speech, and - more importantly - your colleagues in federal and state governments will not stop them known value at the expense of the Federal President increase, we will have in the coming months a blowback from Berlin. Therefore, today a special thanks goes to the party of friends, neither the mirror nor the MDR and other media have provided material for this kind of coverage when they visited us recently.
But even if we manage to perform again as a party is not closed, the campaign simple. Even if one gets 15 percent, has 85 percent against it. That is our chance to meet no matter whether in the press and in daily life, people who are not in our opinion, is much higher than the chance to meet like-minded people. When you are in Berlin in opposition, does not really from when we ruled, we feel the resistance, significantly also straight out of the CDU. In addition, liberal ideas are
often uncomfortable. We promise no one effortless prosperity, we know that there is no wealth for all. We know that no country save its citizens from all walks of life risks, or they can hedge against it.
But we also know that state-aid paternalism always, is control. We know that a state can only spend what they deserve its citizens. We know that people work hard only when they see an advantage for himself.
title,
maybe we have a more honest picture of the people, the very sure we have a more realistic picture of the state and the limits of his abilities. We want a strong, capable and competent state where it is inevitable and where only he is able to solve the problems really are. We do not want a state where he disenfranchised, even if it does so in the best of intentions. We do not want a state that is financially overextended, and above all its citizens and businesses.
title,
in Saxony-Anhalt we are the only party, the only faction in the parliament, which regards it as not fair if we ask only for the needs of people living in transfer implications. We know that a just state, a state fair always Both sides need to see - the side of those who are powerful, and the side of those in need of help.
We are clearly on the social market economy and we are a caring society. But fairness can only be made through the know that they are not used to charge and claim that they are not the idiots of the nation. And only then can those who need help, even to leave that the assistance can be given to you in the future. Because the social market economy only works if performance is worth and if there is a solidarity pact within the company, the position and interests all taken into account.
title,
in Saxony-Anhalt we are the only party that asks not just what the state may do for? But we wonder what he must do for sure. If we are convinced that it is necessary to state regulation, it must be such that people follow their own interests and not that the state must compel its citizens with an enormous effort to achieve compliance.
title,
alone makes this unique feature it is important that it continues to remain strong liberal force in the House, most are in our government. We believe that the other parties on it, to invent more state functions and the people who every day work hard for their income to charge even more. We believe that the other parties on it, to invent more rules that we citizens are disempowered and disenfranchised.
title,
we are right in the election campaign. You will notice not only because they now have to pay for the beer itself. It's election campaign. Not for parliamentary elections, but for the state elections, even if much of what you'll hear in the coming weeks, sounds as if we choose the new Bundestag. The FDP parliamentary group in the last five years, even from the perspective of us made more critical accompanying press a good job. We controlled the state government, sometimes with the help of the country's Constitutional Court, the Supervisor or the state audit court, and who reads the newspaper carefully, who knows: There was and is a lot to check. Think currently handle only about how the CDU and SPD, with the important office of the Stasi officer. First had to resign the office holder, then you could not agree on a suitable candidate. Then it was not the best, but the candidate of the SPD party of chosen for tactical reasons. But he fell in the parliament by the first ballot. And now shown in court that the SPD-led Justice Department probably not everything has proceeded correctly. We shall explain the legal committee. A government the deal so with major offices, it does not deserve to be reelected. But we have not only checks but also provided a constructive work, especially in the legislative process. This was in view of the quality of many bills sorely needed.
is how the situation is now, at the beginning of the election year?
We have a government of CDU and SPD, which has been comfortably furnished, we have ministers who do like to continue to do. If it is true that elections will be decided more by people, the voters on 20 March is not an easy choice. Reiner Haseloff is a bureaucrat, and what is problematic for a Prime Minister , is a man who wants to hurt anyone. As my heart beats more for a CDU-led government, I hope that I underestimated him, just as we have all underestimated in 2002 Wolfgang Böhmer.
his SPD opponent Bullerjahn is trapped in his own concepts and ideas is in the wrong party. Not only did the SPD so everyone in the same low throws, has the independent thoughts, thoughts fit to as good as that of the SPD Chancellor Schroeder. However, he does not attempt to implement his plans seriously. He understands, however, to give renovators, without really doing much more than talk about it.
Title,
I for my part, Mr. Boehmer miss now and also because I - sadly believe that neither Mr. nor Mr. Haseloff is Bullerjahn Prime Minister.
Because red is red is a serious option, but perhaps not with Jens Bullerjahn, but with Katrin Budde. do because, as much as the ministers kept their positions all within the SPD, in party and parliamentary group with Katrin Budde heard at the top, it sounds completely different.
jelly has the "Party of Order" is the first MP to be and to get over 30 percent. It is unfortunately a serious Opption as prime minister, no matter what the SPD says the election campaign. And although that woman solder (one of two National chairman of the Left) already back from communism as a goal of their party babbling.
title,
the SPD will ultimately not matter with whom she is a junior partner, as her care in 1994 was to make to tolerate from the left and that was just four years after the transition.
What have tormented us in the next few weeks be: We must mobilize our voters and that each of them. This is especially important in times of making in which fewer and fewer voters of their right to vote. We must mobilize our constituents to which the other parties to remain calm at home.
title, whoever chooses
us? Who could be our voters? Our constituents are
:
• who wants to take his life into his own hands
• who does not want to wait for the State or other than the first problem solver
• he who sees freedom from security who only wants to generate
• what to distribute the state
• who is willing to work for others and for the community
• who does not want to live at the expense of future generations.
title,
for these people we need to make an offer, such as in education policy, we do not want to leave to the left of the SPD and Left. We stand by the structured school system. We also see that we need further improvements, but we do not need new types of schools, no new experiments in our schools. We need better conditions for our teachers, not simply old wine in new bottles, let alone reform, forcing us once again to lead debates on school sites and school buildings. The Stadträdte know what I'm talking about.
What will happen if there is a red-red government and probably, if the CDU SPD leaves the education department, as it currently makes over Germany in such coalitions and how Jens Bulerjahn it massively from the CDU calls. So who wants to continuous quality improvement rather than structural debates, must choose FDP. Those who trust in our teachers, in more local responsibility is, rather than dreaming of experiments on the types of schools, must choose the FDP.
title,
we represent the interests of the middle class. SMEs, which are in our country are those who every day have to earn their money and generate the taxes that we deny the public expenditure.
We have 2002 to 2006 proved that we have the responsibility contribute to the economy and finances. We scored in the fourth legislature of the land of the red-red lethargy. Saxony-Anhalt has gathered momentum. Unfortunately, the pace has slowed with the SPD again. For the CDU and the SPD need a lot of power in the government to find a consensus. The result is laws that often remain stuck in symbolic politics, or that need work by the Constitutional Court. Where have
provided in the fourth legislature three investment laws to facilitate greater corporate freedom are, in the fifth legislature, especially prohibition laws. The now sold benefits of this government with all due respect to the federal government rather imputable to the land, for both job creation and the fiscal consolidation is not their own services. We are not better than other eastern German states, but use the economic upswing. Federal Economics Minister is even clean, but not Haseloff, but Brüderle!
looks even worse from the balance sheet when it asks for the creation of open spaces, the reduction of bureaucracy, strengthening of civil rights. I will mention only the Non smoking Protection and the Fight Dog Act that have limited both these rights, without the protection they promise guaranteed. Conclusion Minister of Social Affairs had just been appointed Non smoking Protection Act, It works well in public buildings (as it has with all due respect even before work) and there were still shortcomings in the restaurant industry. Those like me who is much in the country on the move, knows that seem to be working in the catering, the scheme only in downtown areas of big cities. In the countryside it seems to interest almost anyone in the club and restaurants on the football fields of our state anyway.
And the Biting Incidents with dogs are fighting dogs since the law did not decrease. This does not mean that the goal of protecting people from tobacco smoke or harmful effect on health from dangerous dogs is wrong, it shows very clearly just, the laws are not always the correct agents. In the field of dangerous dogs, unfortunately, even with such difficult issues such as child protection, each € would bring more to the local level more than any law. Therefore, we have argued for a more equitable revenue sharing between state and municipalities and even have the savings needed for this are in the state budget shows.
title,
the themes of the future, such as skills shortages, quality of education, higher education and training, demographic change, we will successfully overcome only if Saxony-Anhalt as a cosmopolitan country, as an attractive business location, to be innovative, as is seen worth living . We will Saxony-Anhalt only able to keep fit for the competition, with a parliament and a government that has the courage to decide who has a clear compass and a clear direction. This CDU and SPD have in common is not the strength. This requires a strong FDP, which has also not afraid of difficult decisions.
Title
The colors of Saxony-Anhalt are black and not red-yellow-red. That this is reflected in the government, we will work in the coming weeks and we will do so as we make policy - with passion, not with fear.
0 comments:
Post a Comment